From a luminaire data file to a collaborative system for healthy lighting environments
Many people may not know what an IES profile is.
But if you have ever worked with lighting design, luminaire selection, illuminance simulation, project verification, or even seen a designer simulate lighting in software, you have probably used it indirectly.
Simply put: An IES profile is like the “light distribution ID card” of a luminaire.
It records how a luminaire emits light: Where the light goes, how much light is emitted in different directions, what the beam distribution looks like, and how the luminaire performs in space.
When designers import this file into lighting design or spatial simulation software such as DIALux, AGi32, Relux, Kujiale, COOLUX, or other platforms, they can calculate: Illuminance, uniformity, glare risk, wall brightness, dark zones, and compliance with design requirements.
So although an IES profile may look like a small technical file, it is actually one of the lighting industry’s most important foundation languages.
Traditionally, it answers one question: How does this luminaire distribute light into space?
But in the era of healthy lighting, the real question is changing: What kind of light does a person actually receive in a specific space, at a specific time, while performing a specific activity?
That is where an upgraded IES profile becomes meaningful.
1. Traditional IES Profile Solves the Question: Where Does the Light Go?
Traditional IES profiles are extremely important.
Without them, designers would struggle to predict how a luminaire performs once installed in a real space.
They allow lighting design to move from experience-based judgment to calculated simulation.
For example:
- Is a downlight narrow beam or wide beam?
- Does a linear luminaire emit only downward light, or also side light?
- Is an office luminaire evenly diffused, or is it bright in the center and weak at the edges?
- Does a classroom, office, hotel lobby, or retail space meet illuminance requirements?
These questions depend on photometric data files such as IES profiles.
The core value of a traditional IES profile is: It allows the way a luminaire emits light to be read, simulated, and calculated by software.
But its limitation is also clear.
It mainly describes: How the luminaire emits light.
It does not fully describe: How people receive light.
2. In Healthy Lighting, Light Is Not Only on the Desk — It Enters the Eyes and the Body
In conventional lighting design, the most common calculation target has been: Horizontal illuminance.
In other words, how many lux are delivered to a desk, floor, or working plane.
This remains important for visual tasks.
But healthy lighting requires a broader question: Does the right light, with the right spectrum, intensity, direction, and timing, enter the human eye and provide the appropriate biological signal?
This is where EDI / DER becomes important.
Einfach ausgedrückt:
EDI helps us understand the equivalent stimulus received by different biological light-response channels.
DER helps us understand how efficient a light source is in stimulating those channels compared with a reference source.
But healthy light cannot be reduced to one number.
In particular, melanopic EDI is useful for understanding circadian lighting, daytime alertness support, and lower nighttime biological disruption.
The same luminaire may produce very different human effects depending on: Space, position, viewing direction, time of day, activity, duration of exposure, and the person using the space.
Therefore, the next generation of profile should not contain only photometric data.
It should include:
- EDI / DER
- Spectral data
- Spatial model
- Eye-position model
- Time model
- Activity model
- Human-factor model
Only then can healthy lighting move from a marketing claim to a system that can be designed, calculated, verified, and improved.
3. The Real Meaning of an Upgraded IES Profile: From Luminaire Data to Human Light Exposure Data
If a future upgraded IES profile can integrate EDI / DER, spatial models, and human-factor models, it will no longer be just a luminaire data file.
It will become a new foundation data structure for the industry.
A traditional profile says: How does this luminaire emit light?
An upgraded profile begins to ask: Can this luminaire, in this space, at this time, for this activity and this user, deliver the right light exposure?
This is a critical shift.
It means the core object of evaluation in lighting is moving: From luminaire performance, to spatial delivery, to actual human exposure.
This will redefine the roles of lighting designers, software companies, and measurement instrument companies.
4. For Lighting Designers: From Creating Beautiful Light to Delivering Verifiable Good Light
Lighting designers will be among the most important players in this transformation.
Traditionally, the value of an excellent lighting designer has been expressed through: Aesthetics, atmosphere, hierarchy, glare control, material expression, emotional tone, and compliance with illuminance levels.
These remain essential.
But in the future, the professional value of designers will be expanded.
Clients will increasingly ask:
- Does this office truly support daytime focus?
- Does this hotel room support nighttime relaxation?
- Does this classroom provide sufficient daytime light exposure?
- Does this senior-care environment support circadian stability?
- Does this home reduce unnecessary biological stimulation before sleep?
These questions cannot be answered by aesthetics alone.
They cannot be answered by CCT alone.
Designers will need new tools to say: I am not only designing the visual effect of light. I am designing the quality of human light exposure.
New roles for designers
Future lighting designers may become:
- Healthy lighting environment strategists
- Human light exposure designers
- Human-centric lighting consultants
- Scene-based light recipe designers
- Verification-oriented lighting system integrators
This expands the service boundary of lighting design.
New business value for designers
An upgraded IES profile may create new professional service opportunities:
- Healthy lighting strategy consulting
- EDI / DER simulation design
- Circadian lighting scene design
- Sleep-friendly residential lighting design
- WELL / healthy building alignment services
- Post-installation commissioning
- Annual re-measurement and optimization services
This means designers are no longer only selling drawings or design schemes.
They can sell: Verifiable healthy lighting outcomes.
That is an important transition from aesthetic service to evidence-based professional service.
5. For Software Companies: From Illuminance Calculation Tools to Healthy Lighting Simulation Platforms
Software companies may be one of the biggest beneficiaries of this shift.
All new data models need software to carry them.
Traditional design software mainly calculates: Illuminance, uniformity, glare, light distribution, energy use, and basic scene effects.
But if an upgraded IES profile can include EDI / DER, spectrum, space, human factors, and time, software can evolve from a lighting calculation tool into: A healthy lighting environment simulation platform.
This is a major commercial upgrade.
New capabilities for software companies
EDI / DER simulation
Designers could directly see melanopic EDI at different seats, different eye positions, and different viewing directions.
Human-eye-view modeling
Instead of only simulating working planes, software could model seated eye height, standing eye height, elderly users, children, hospital beds, reading positions, and screen-work positions.
Time-based simulation
Healthy lighting is not a static rendering. It changes across morning, daytime, evening, nighttime, and late night. Software should simulate 24-hour light patterns, daylight plus electric light, automatic dimming strategies, pre-sleep low-disruption scenes, and shift-worker exposure strategies.
Activity-based simulation
A living room may support reading, watching TV, family interaction, evening relaxation, pre-sleep preparation, and morning activation. Software that connects activity models with light exposure will become far more valuable.
Verification loop
Future software should not stop at design-stage simulation. It should receive on-site measurement data and compare:
- Design value vs measured value
- Simulation value vs verification value
- Initial condition vs operational condition
- Ideal light environment vs actual light environment
This turns software from a design tool into a data platform for design, construction, verification, and operation.
New business value for software companies
This can create new revenue models:
- Healthy lighting modules
- EDI / DER calculation engines
- WELL reporting and compliance tools
- Human-factor simulation packages
- Cloud-based light environment data services
- Design–verification–operation platforms
- API integration with sensors, controls, and measurement instruments
Software companies will no longer only sell design tools.
They may become the core data layer of healthy buildings and intelligent spaces.
6. For Measurement Instrument Companies: From Light Meters to Verification Infrastructure for Healthy Lighting
Measurement instrument companies will also face major opportunities.
If healthy lighting is to become verifiable, on-site measurement is essential.
- Without measurement, there is no verification.
- Without verification, there is no trust.
- Without trust, there is no high-value healthy lighting market.
Traditionally, measurement instruments have focused on: Lux, CCT, CRI, chromaticity, flicker, spectrum, and luminous flux.
But the future question is not only whether a luminaire performs well. It is: Does the person in the space actually receive the right light?
New roles for measurement instrument companies
Measurement instrument companies may become:
- Healthy lighting verification tool providers
- On-site EDI / DER measurement gateways
- Spatial light exposure data collectors
- WELL / healthy building verification supporters
- Field calibration partners for design software and control systems
- Long-term monitoring sensor providers
This role is critical because all design models must eventually return to the real site.
New capabilities needed
Measure EDI / DER, not only lux
Instruments must calculate α-opic metrics, including melanopic EDI, from spectral data.
Measure spatial distribution, not only a single point
Healthy lighting requires data from different seats, eye positions, viewing directions, user postures, and time periods.
Measure accumulated exposure, not only an instant reading
Light has a time dimension. Too little daytime light and too much nighttime stimulation are both problems. Instruments and sensors should support exposure start time, accumulated exposure, daily light curves, 24-hour light environment records, and long-term operational stability.
Measure temporal light quality, not only spectrum
Flicker may be a luminaire problem, a control problem, a dimming problem, a spatial interaction problem, or a scene-transition problem. Future verification should consider spectrum, biological exposure, flicker risk, dimming stability, dynamic scenes, and long-term temporal quality.
New business value for measurement instrument companies
Practical opportunities may include:
- Professional EDI / DER meters
- WELL Light verification tools
- Healthy residential lighting inspection kits
- School / office / healthcare / senior-care testing packages
- On-site commissioning tools for designers
- Cloud-based report generation
- Annual re-measurement and calibration services
- Long-term monitoring modules connected to control systems
- Healthy light inspection services for building owners
In the future, measurement instrument companies may not just sell devices.
They may sell: The trust infrastructure of healthy lighting.
7. A New Triangle: Designers, Software Companies, and Measurement Instrument Companies
In the traditional lighting industry, these three roles were relatively separate.
- Designers used software.
- Instrument companies supplied tools.
- Software companies provided calculation platforms.
In the healthy lighting era, the three will become tightly connected.
A future closed-loop workflow may look like this:
Step 1: Designers define the healthy lighting strategy
For example: daytime activation, nighttime protection, sleep-friendly lighting, office performance, or circadian support for senior care.
Step 2: Software simulates EDI / DER + spatial + human-factor exposure
Design-stage prediction becomes more human-centered.
Step 3: Luminaires and control systems deliver targeted scenes
The system no longer delivers only power or illuminance, but targeted light exposure.
Step 4: Measurement instruments verify the real site
Measured EDI / DER, flicker, and spatial distribution confirm whether the design intent is achieved.
Step 5: Software compares measured values with design values
Models are calibrated, and deviations are corrected.
Step 6: Designers and building owners receive traceable reports
Healthy lighting becomes a verifiable deliverable, not just a promise.
Once this loop is established, healthy lighting gains a real foundation for industrialization.
8. The Biggest Business Shift: From Selling Products to Selling Verifiable Outcomes
The commercial meaning of an upgraded IES profile is clear: It allows the lighting industry to move from product price competition to outcome value competition.
In the past, the market often compared:
- Who has the cheaper luminaire?
- Who has higher efficacy?
- Who has a better-looking product?
- Who has more attractive specifications?
In the future, the market can compare:
- Who can deliver better daytime light exposure?
- Who can reduce nighttime biological disruption?
- Who can make schools, offices, hotels, and senior-care environments more verifiable?
- Who can provide a complete data chain from design to construction, verification, and operation?
This shifts lighting from hardware supply to light environment services.
9. Strategic Meaning for GLGA / LRS
This direction is highly aligned with what GLGA and LRS are working to promote.
Good Light Wake-up Call is not about slogans. It is a call for the industry to recognize that good light must be designed, calculated, verified, and continuously improved.
The EDI / DER Working Group should not only discuss new metrics. Its deeper value is to connect LED makers, luminaire companies, design software providers, control systems, measurement instruments, and standards organizations around a shared data language.
In. Licht Ultra / Pro / Well can play a role not only as tools, but as field verification gateways within this future data chain.
deLIGHTED Talk Asia / GILE 2026 can become an important platform to bring this topic to the Asian and global lighting ecosystem.
Because this is not the product agenda of a single company.
It is a foundation question for whether the healthy lighting industry can truly become real.
10. Conclusion: Not Just Upgrading a File, But Upgrading the Logic of the Industry
An IES profile was originally the light distribution ID card of a luminaire.
But if it begins to include EDI / DER, spatial models, and human-factor models, it may become: The foundation data language of healthy lighting environments.
This means the lighting industry is beginning to change its core question.
In the past, we asked:
- Is this luminaire bright enough?
- Is this space bright enough?
In the future, we must ask: Does this person, in this space, at this time, for this activity, receive the right light?
That is the real starting point of healthy lighting.
The next generation of lighting competition will not only be about brighter luminaires, higher efficacy, or better appearance.
It will be about who can build a complete capability:
- Designed by professionals.
- Simulated by software.
- Delivered by products and systems.
- Measured on site.
- Calibrated through data.
- Understood by building owners.
That is how healthy lighting moves from concept to industry.
The meaning of an upgraded IES profile is not that it adds another data field.
It means the lighting industry is finally moving from: Describing light, to understanding people, space, time, and the human experience of light.
English 
Chinese (Taiwan) 
Chinese (China) 
German